While these comparisons are not a conclusive test, they may form part of a cogent argument; an entire comment should not be dismissed because it includes a comparative statement like this.
2.
They were republished in 1839, with the " Comparative Statement " and other pieces as " Tracts on Docks and Commerce, printed between 1793 and 1800 ".
3.
And as OTHERSTUFF states : " While these comparisons are not a conclusive test, they may form part of a cogent argument; an entire comment should not be dismissed because it includes a comparative statement like this . " talk ) 07 : 24, 7 April 2014 ( UTC)
4.
:: : : : : From the very article you linked ( WAX ) : " an entire comment should not be dismissed because it includes a comparative statement like this, " and it states how there is a " misconception that this section is blanket ban on ever referencing other articles or deletion debates . " Would you look at that?
5.
Your first link WP : OTHERSTUFF seems to support my argument it says : " ( This may be an argument that this article is not bad enough to be speedily deleted; but that does not mean it should be kept . ) While these comparisons are not a conclusive test, they may form part of a cogent argument; an entire comment should not be dismissed because it includes a comparative statement like this . " My argument seems to stand up in that I don't think this article should be quickly deleted and instead it should be improved . talk ) 17 : 03, 23 June 2014 ( UTC)
मोबाइल